- Homepage
- social sciences
- philosophy
- NAUK NEZNANJA
- comics
- computer science
- current affairs
-
dictionaries / grammars / foreign languages
-
dictionaries
- croatian dictionaries
- czech dictionaries
- dictionary of art
- english dictionaries
- french dictionaries
- german dictionaries
- greek dictionaries
- italian dictionaries
- latin dictionaries
- polish dictionaries
- portuguese dictionaries
- romanian dictionaries
- russian dictionaries
- spanish dictionaries
- slovak dictionaries
- slovenian dictionaries
- foreign languages
- grammar
-
dictionaries
- economics
- gifts
- encyclopedia / handbooks
- erotica / sex
- history
- hobbies
- humour
- literature
- magazines
- maritime affairs
- multimedia publications
- natural science
- other editions
- politics
- popular science
-
reading
- 1st grade of elementary school
- 2nd grade of elementary school
- 3rd grade of elementary school
- 4th grade of elementary school
- 5th grade of elementary school
- 6th grade of elementary school
- 7th grade of elementary school
- 8th grade elementary school
- 1st grade of high school
- 2nd grade of high school
- 3rd grade of high school
- 4th grade of high school
- religion / mythology
- social sciences
- technology / engineering / construction
- textbooks
- textbooks of vocational schools and faculties
- tourism
- travel-records
About the book NAUK NEZNANJA
U knjizi Borslava Mikulića Nauk neznanja. Retrospekcije o Kangrgi i nasljeđu praksisa sabrani su tekstovi različitog tipa: osvrti, rasprave, prikazi, studije, intervjui o doprinosima praksisovskog filozofskog kruga, nastali u periodu od 1985. do 2014. godine. Riječima Srđana Damnjanovića, u pitanju nije jednostavna retrospekcije niti još jedan pokušaj "parazitiranja na praksis filozofiji", naprotiv, riječ je o prevrednovanju vlastitog odnosa prema praksisu, pri čemu “činjenica da se radi o problematizaciji misaonog stanovišta koje je autoru blisko, nije otupila kritičku oštricu. Borislav Mikulić nije prećutao naprsline i ideologeme praksis filozofije, a ta osetljivost na bliske razlike deluje heruistički podsticajnije i daleko bespoštednije nego standardna kritika, koja je sa udaljenije filozofske pozicije upućivala na ideološku naivnost praksisovaca. Zato deluje da je Mikulićeva perspektiva više okrenuti pitanjima o budućnosti praksis filozofije, nego imaginarnom prostoru zaustavljene prošlosti.”