- Homepage
- social sciences
- philosophy
- THE REASON WHY - A Theory of Philosophical Explanation
- comics
- computer science
- current affairs
-
dictionaries / grammars / foreign languages
-
dictionaries
- croatian dictionaries
- czech dictionaries
- dictionary of art
- english dictionaries
- french dictionaries
- german dictionaries
- greek dictionaries
- italian dictionaries
- latin dictionaries
- polish dictionaries
- portuguese dictionaries
- romanian dictionaries
- russian dictionaries
- spanish dictionaries
- slovak dictionaries
- slovenian dictionaries
- foreign languages
- grammar
-
dictionaries
- economics
- gifts
- encyclopedia / handbooks
- erotica / sex
- history
- hobbies
- humour
- literature
- magazines
- maritime affairs
- multimedia publications
- natural science
- other editions
- politics
- popular science
-
reading
- 1st grade of elementary school
- 2nd grade of elementary school
- 3rd grade of elementary school
- 4th grade of elementary school
- 5th grade of elementary school
- 6th grade of elementary school
- 7th grade of elementary school
- 8th grade elementary school
- 1st grade of high school
- 2nd grade of high school
- 3rd grade of high school
- 4th grade of high school
- religion / mythology
- social sciences
- technology / engineering / construction
- textbooks
- textbooks of vocational schools and faculties
- tourism
- travel-records

About the book THE REASON WHY - A Theory of Philosophical Explanation
Natural science and religion are both in the business of providing explanations, but the former unlike the latter lays a special claim to reason. It aspires to a rationality that the latter either forswears or is incapable of attaining. Yet what makes a rational explanation rational? The main thesis that I shall be advancing is that underlying a rational explanation are a number of fundamental ideas and principles which are all mutually complementary and interdependent, and provide an insight into how the world is actually made up. It is a logical requirement of a rational explanation that such ideas, and the principles that go with them, should form a self-supporting and self-explanatory analytical system. One such idea, and a vital component of the system, is the idea of self.
That the idea of self is implicated in the machinery of concepts that underlie a rational explanation is not all that surprising. Use of concepts alone already provides us with a clue. Thus a use of concepts manifestly presupposes the possibility of distinguishing between certain specimen items and the kinds, or species, which such items exemplify. But such a distinction can be made only by an agent who is able to think of him/herself as an example of a kind, and this involves an act of self-reference which is a definitional feature of selfhood.